Cannibalism

What were your initial thoughts about this book prior to reading it? Did anything in the book surprise you or challenge your pre-existing notions about cannibalism?

Consider Schutt’s writing style and approach. How does his background in biology shape his exploration of the topic? Do you find his perspective compelling or biased in any way?

How does Schutt explain the biological and evolutionary reasons for cannibalism in animals? What are some examples he provides, and how do they help demystify the behavior?

How does Schutt approach the subject of human cannibalism compared to animal behavior? Discuss the similarities and differences between cannibalism in the animal kingdom and in human societies as presented in the book. How does Schutt use these comparisons to shed light on the nature of cannibalism?

Schutt discusses the ethical implications of cannibalism. What are the main arguments he presents, and how do they relate to broader questions of morality and survival?

How does Schutt address the role of culture in shaping views about cannibalism? Are there specific cultures or historical periods he highlights, and how do they contribute to the book’s themes?

Do you think Schutt provides a balanced view of the scientific and historical aspects of cannibalism? Are there any areas where you felt more research or different perspectives could have been included?

What broader implications about nature, survival, and human behavior can be drawn from this book? How might the insights provided in Cannibalism: A Perfectly Natural History be relevant to contemporary issues or discussions?

How has reading this book influenced your views on cannibalism, whether in nature or human societies? Did it challenge any personal beliefs or preconceived notions?