The 120 Days of Sodom

By Marquis de Sade

An unfinished eighteenth-century manuscript presenting an extreme and controversial exploration of power, excess, and moral transgression within the context of Enlightenment-era thought. Written in 1785 during the author's imprisonment, The 120 Days of Sodom takes the form of a structured narrative in which a group of libertines withdraw from society to enact a systematised catalogue of behaviours intended to test the limits of human conduct.

The work is notable less for conventional narrative development than for its methodical organisation, reflecting an attempt to classify and enumerate forms of desire and domination. Its stark and often disturbing content has ensured its reputation as one of the most challenging texts of its period. At the same time, it has been examined within the history of ideas as a radical inversion of moral philosophy, engaging-however provocatively-with questions of freedom, authority, and the boundaries of reason.

Incomplete and preserved in manuscript form for many years, the text occupies a complex position between literature, philosophical provocation, and historical document. Its continued study reflects not endorsement of its content, but its significance in understanding the outer limits of Enlightenment discourse and the development of later discussions of transgression in literature and philosophy.

BUY THE BOOK

Published Jun 23, 2008

464 pages

Average rating: 7.6

5 RATINGS

|

Community Reviews

jslee03
Jul 16, 2026
9/10 stars
I kinda love this book and I can't recommend this book. It's a 9 because the last part kinda sucks (it's murder, murder, murder, murder), but that's also not fair because de Sade didn't finish writing the last three parts. If we account for that, it's a 10. There's too much to talk about in a brief review, but the thing not conveyed in descriptions of this book is that it's absurd and I'm fairly certain de Sade is aware of it. It's not absurd in the sense that de Sade intended for it to be a satire, but I get the sense he's inventing kinks he himself doesn't have; what interests him is the mechanism of stimulation, which involves horror and hilarity. It's not poorly written too. For writing of its era, it actually achieves a stirring effect. It's also not the best of its era, but the good, brisk, emotional writing enhances the strangeness of its content. Which is my final say for this review: it's a very strange book, and it's not strange because its author is strange (though he is), it's strange because it touches on aspects of the human psyche without fully grasping it. And that's why we read: to become aware of the strangeness of our existence.

See why thousands of readers are using Bookclubs to stay connected.