Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction

By Dan Gardner and Philip E. Tetlock

NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • NAMED ONE OF THE BEST BOOKS OF THE YEAR BY THE ECONOMIST  “The most important book on decision making since Daniel Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow.”—Jason Zweig, The Wall Street Journal   Everyone would benefit from seeing further into the future, whether buying stocks, crafting policy, launching a new product, or simply planning the week’s meals. Unfortunately, people tend to be terrible forecasters. As Wharton professor Philip Tetlock showed in a landmark 2005 study, even experts’ predictions are only slightly better than chance. However, an important and underreported conclusion of that study was that some experts do have real foresight, and Tetlock has spent the past decade trying to figure out why. What makes some people so good? And can this talent be taught?   In Superforecasting, Tetlock and coauthor Dan Gardner offer a masterwork on prediction, drawing on decades of research and the results of a massive, government-funded forecasting tournament. The Good Judgment Project involves tens of thousands of ordinary people—including a Brooklyn filmmaker, a retired pipe installer, and a former ballroom dancer—who set out to forecast global events. Some of the volunteers have turned out to be astonishingly good. They’ve beaten other benchmarks, competitors, and prediction markets. They’ve even beaten the collective judgment of intelligence analysts with access to classified information. They are "superforecasters."   In this groundbreaking and accessible book, Tetlock and Gardner show us how we can learn from this elite group. Weaving together stories of forecasting successes (the raid on Osama bin Laden’s compound) and failures (the Bay of Pigs) and interviews with a range of high-level decision makers, from David Petraeus to Robert Rubin, they show that good forecasting doesn’t require powerful computers or arcane methods. It involves gathering evidence from a variety of sources, thinking probabilistically, working in teams, keeping score, and being willing to admit error and change course. Superforecasting offers the first demonstrably effective way to improve our ability to predict the future—whether in business, finance, politics, international affairs, or daily life—and is destined to become a modern classic.

BUY THE BOOK

Published Sep 13, 2016

352 pages

Average rating: 7.27

11 RATINGS

|

|

BOOK TALK

Community Reviews

Jurij
8/10 stars
This book is extremely easy to explain: some people read news for fun and try to predict how likely something may happen like a certain person winning an election. That's it. There is the title of superforecasters, but they just read a lot of news stories about an event. There is nothing deep or new here as such.

I feel like I'm one of the most critical reviewers on this site because of my logical approach to academic books. Here the claim is that you can be better or worse at forecasting. One thing that is proven to correlate with forecasting succes is IQ. The inherited thing. Then the other thing he claims also correlates with good prediction numbers is how much news you read about the topic you guess on. Fine, but why call this more than what it is? "Reading up on a topic." Why claim there is something deep, holistic and magical to it? It's just interest in this area. People not so interested in using their free time on this social game won't do it. It seems like IQ and interest is all that matters here. And there is not much money to be made on it anyhow. People just sit at home and guess on stuff for fun. If this was very useful the best predictors would be headhunted by big companies or at least get some wage for their work.

At the end the title and topic promise lets the book down. There are some interesting stories here. But he doesn't prove anything. It's mostly talk about news. Would be fun to try it out. But if there is no money in it I don't know how much time I would be willing to put into it.

It would be fun to see newspapers use some of the prediction numbers next to their articles. Today they just use words like: may happen, could happen, high chance of happening. A number would give me much more info.

See why thousands of readers are using Bookclubs to stay connected.