Freakonomics Revised and Expanded Edition: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything

The legendary bestseller that made millions look at the world in a radically different way returns in a new edition, now including an exclusive discussion between the authors and bestselling professor of psychology Angela Duckworth.

Which is more dangerous, a gun or a swimming pool? Which should be feared more: snakes or french fries? Why do sumo wrestlers cheat? In this groundbreaking book, leading economist Steven Levitt--Professor of Economics at the University of Chicago and winner of the American Economic Association's John Bates Clark medal for the economist under 40 who has made the greatest contribution to the discipline--reveals that the answers. Joined by acclaimed author and podcast host Stephen J. Dubner, Levitt presents a brilliant--and brilliantly entertaining--account of how incentives of the most hidden sort drive behavior in ways that turn conventional wisdom on its head.

BUY THE BOOK

352 pages

Average rating: 7

2 RATINGS

|

Community Reviews

amber.nix
Feb 05, 2024
10/10 stars
I still use this book to talk about why overturning Roe v Wade is an idiotic economic decision.
Gems 🤠
Jan 08, 2024
4/10 stars
In 2024 this book is pretty out of date. He mentions several times how unlikely a child is to die by gun but guns are the #1 death of children in the US apart from disease since 2020 , even surpassing car accidents. Last year there were 346 school shootings alone, and unfortunately, by Jan 4 there had already been 4 school shootings this year (News Week, just checked). So, a lot of the statistics and theories are too far from the current situation to be applicable. He is clear that women, of all backgrounds and education, make the best choice of whether or not their able to responsibly have a baby rn. And he seems to support their right to choose. It's clear to me that he's not a eugenisist (a criticism of the book). However, he makes one fundamental flaw over and over: he seems to think he is capable of objective thought and impartiality. that's impossible. he dances real close to racist ideologies and crosses into it at some points. He also seem to spend a lot of time and energy on black culture unaware of his own privilege and internalized racism and how they handicap his reasoning on it. Not a bad read and was culturally signifigant but it also doesn't have application to current experience and has signifigant underlying flaws. 4/10

See why thousands of readers are using Bookclubs to stay connected.